GNSS POSITIONING METHODS COMPARISON

STATIC vs RTK vs PPK vs PPP- Which Method Should You Choose?

One Goal

Accurate & Reliable Positioning

Right Choice

Better Accuracy Better Results

Different Methods

Different Strengths

Work Smarter

Save Time Increase Productivity

01. STATIC GNSS

02. RTK (REAL-TIME KINEMATIC)

03. PPK (POST-PROCESSED KINEMATIC)

images-19

03. PPP (PRECISE POINT POSITIONING)

FEATURE

ACCURACY
REAL-TIME RESULTS
BASE STATION
OBSERVATION TIME
DATA PROCESSING
EQUIPMENT
IDEAL ENVIRONMENT
BEST SUITED FOR

STATIC GNSS

Millimeter - Centimeter
No (Post-processed)
Required (Recommended)
30 min - Several hours
Post-processing
Dual frequency GNSS
Open sky, stable setup
Control points, monitoring, research

RTK (REAL-TIME) PPK

Centimeter
Yes
Yes (Local or CORS)
Instantaneous
Real-time
Rover + Base or Network
Good network coverage
Engineering, construction, stake-out

PPK (POST-PROCESSED)

Centimeter (after processing)
No (Post-processed)
No (Optional)
Depends on project (Minutes to hours)
Post-processing
Rover/Drone GNSS
Any environment
Mapping, UAV, mobile surveys

PPP (PRECISE)

Centimeter - Decimeter (after convergence)
No (Post-processed)
No
Minutes - Hours (for convergence)
Post-processing
Dual frequency GNSS
Global (anywhere)
Scientific, remote, long-term monitoring

ACCURACY (TYPICAL)

STATIC: 1mm - 1 cm

RTK: 1 cm - 2 cm

PPK: 1 cm - 3 cm

PPP: 2 cm - 20 cm

(after convergence)

CONVERGENCE / INITIALIZATION

STATIC: Not required

RTK: Instant

PPK: Not required

PPP: 5 min - 2+ hours

REQUIREMENTS

STATIC: Time & stable setup

RTK: Base or Network

PPK: Post-processing software

PPP: Precise products

(Orbit, Clock,

COMMON APPLICATIONS

  • Construction & Stake-out: RTK
  • UAV / Drone Mapping: PPK
  • Control & Monitoring: STATIC
  • Remote / Scientific Research: PPP